View Single Post
Old 11-20-2007, 07:19 AM   #8 (permalink)
Pale Rider
Elite Member
 
Pale Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,928
Casino Cash: $381429
Quote:
Originally Posted by centex View Post
I seem to recall other dicta out of the Courts that has mocked those that claim "least sophisticated" status while at the same time having created a mountain of paperwork in various cases.
LSC does not apply to the individual. It applies to the situation. The party can be the most sophisticated consumer, and the standard will still apply. It is a violation of what would be confusing or misleading if it fell in the hands of an LSC, not if the current party is an LSC. At least from what I have read anyway.
Pale Rider is offline   Reply With Quote