[PDXBLAZERFAN]

The idea for this letter kind of sprang from Hannah's post about New York state requiring more documents (proof of license and affidivat) before granting a default judgment.

While on my state's AG site, there was a link to the state's Administrative Rules regarding collection agencies.

When I read the certified mail provision, I thought it was required of consumers. In fact, the rule referred to Creditors.

The letter was to voice my ideas in an effort to protect Oregon consumers.

Nothing to do with my other posts/case.

Think the state would ever require CA to use certified mail for the all important initial communication. Congress? Has this been proposed? Any debate record?