View Single Post
Old 05-26-2008, 09:00 PM   #8 (permalink)
apexcrsrvc
HONORED GUEST
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 271
Casino Cash: $522800
Quote:
Originally Posted by centex View Post
There shouldn't be a problem with the decision not to allow DU7 to score AU accounts because it defaults them to manual underwriting. As a result, the decisioning still takes into account those AU TL's that were within the spirit of both the ECOA and the FNMA underwriting guidelines.

Demonstrating that the account was an AU status through the spouse is not a difficult thing. The only people inconvenienced will be those that purchased AU tradelines or where they convinced Aunt Suzie's next door neighbors third cousin's sister to add someone as an AU. And if one is having to rely on either of those situations in order to be 'mortgage-worthy' then I would suggest that they really do not have the creditworthiness in this climate to be considered for a 30-year $200K loan, collateralized or not.
No, actually, it doesn't appear to when both spouses are on the app. It evidently only considers AU accounts when the holder spouse isn't involved in the app. That is coming from the Announcement and it seems problematic in rather common contexts that play out quite frequently.
__________________
http://www.apexcreditservices.com

No part of the post above or anything posted by us herein is to be considered legal advice. If you seek legal advice, contact a licensed attorney within your jurisdiction. No part of our website link, including clicking upon it, constitutes an offer of any kind or an advertisement to seek an agreement of any kind. Its placement here is for informational purposes exclusively.
apexcrsrvc is offline   Reply With Quote