View Single Post
Old 05-26-2008, 09:17 PM   #9 (permalink)
centex
HONORED GUEST
 
centex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austin-area
Posts: 2,691
Casino Cash: $332200
Quote:
Originally Posted by apexcrsrvc View Post
No, actually, it doesn't appear to when both spouses are on the app. It evidently only considers AU accounts when the holder spouse isn't involved in the app. That is coming from the Announcement and it seems problematic in rather common contexts that play out quite frequently.

The applicant is still not disadvantaged by being bounced for manual review. Their AU account, properly documented, is considered, which means the review is still consistent with the intent of the ECOA.

My guess is that those manual reviews will also reveal other factors that are legally sufficient for a denial where the applicant was having to rely on an artificially propped score in order to seek the mortgage. While I have no doubt that someone will try to push through some form of frivolous litigation, I see a number of prospective plaintiffs that will have egg on their faces when all is said and done...
__________________
I am not *your* attorney and you are not *my* client. Nothing in this post shall be construed as establishing an attorney-client relationship.

Would you rather us tell you what WILL happen or would you rather have rah-rah bull-droppings from someplace else?
centex is offline   Reply With Quote