| | Notices | Welcome to the Infinite Credit forums.
You are currently viewing our Free Credit Repair Forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free credit repair community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content. Due to bandwidth constraints, PDF files can only be downloaded by registered Members.
Our creditforum will help you fix your own personal credit, there is nothing that a credit repair company can do for you, that you cannot do yourself. Registration to our creditforums is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today Please note that we are not attorneys, we are not selling anything, nothing on this site may be construed as legal advice.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. | Advanced Credit Repair - Dealing with Collection Agencies Discuss Bona fide error is not a repeated error in the CREDIT AND LEGAL ISSUES forums; Ok people....having a brain fart right now and cannot remember which or what cases I read this in?... 
06-22-2008, 02:27 PM
|
#1 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006 Location: Okinawa
Posts: 6,995
Casino Cash: $2739000
| Bona fide error is not a repeated error
Ok people....having a brain fart right now and cannot remember which or what cases I read this in?
__________________
____________
"Be surprised at what people won't do and not at what they do." | 
|  | |
06-23-2008, 02:57 AM
|
#2 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 524
Casino Cash: $415075
| Going out on a limb: Saenz(?) v. TU, or was that about excessive dependency on the electronic verification? Don't have access to my notes at the moment... | |
| | |
06-24-2008, 06:08 PM
|
#3 | | Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6
Casino Cash: $104300
| Quote:
Originally Posted by roybean  Ok people....having a brain fart right now and cannot remember which or what cases I read this in? | Beasley v. Blatt 1994 WL 362185 (Northern District ILL,)
Page v. Checkrite, LTD D. Neb 1984 | |
| | |
06-26-2008, 06:16 PM
|
#4 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 524
Casino Cash: $415075
| Quote:
Originally Posted by scelestic practitioner Beasley v. Blatt 1994 WL 362185 (Northern District ILL,)
Page v. Checkrite, LTD D. Neb 1984 | Any chance these can be added to the collection? | |
| | |
06-27-2008, 08:49 AM
|
#5 | | Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6
Casino Cash: $104300
| Quote:
Originally Posted by neil5623 Any chance these can be added to the collection? | Not sure what this means, I'm kinda new here. | |
| | |
06-27-2008, 10:13 AM
|
#6 | | If You Do Not Like It, Kiss My...
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,540
Casino Cash: $1114200
| Quote:
Originally Posted by scelestic practitioner Not sure what this means, I'm kinda new here. | Neil wants Roybean to put that in the Case Law forum. 
__________________
How come "phonetically" is spelt with a "ph"? | |
| | |
06-27-2008, 12:22 PM
|
#7 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 524
Casino Cash: $415075
| Right. If it's what it sounds like, it will come in handy in a couple of months. | |
| | |
06-27-2008, 12:28 PM
|
#8 | | Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Casino Cash: $102600
| I'll post the opinions if I don't get banned first.
(I used to be scelestic practitioner) | |
| | |
06-27-2008, 12:55 PM
|
#9 | | Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Casino Cash: $102600
| Quote:
Originally Posted by scelestic practitioner Beasley v. Blatt 1994 WL 362185 (Northern District ILL,)
Page v. Checkrite, LTD D. Neb 1984 | Here's the jist of beasley (page was unreported so i'll have to do some more looking)
Where a violation is routinely committed it cannot be said to be either an error or bonafide. For example, a debt collector could not sustain bona fide error defense where it believed it was dealing with a commercial and not a consumer debt when it was
established that collector regularly mailed identical form collection letters to consumer and commercial debtors alike. Beasley v. Blatt 1994 WL 362185 (N.D. Ill. 1994) | |
| | |
06-27-2008, 01:43 PM
|
#10 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 524
Casino Cash: $415075
| K, that might work. Specifically, I am looking for something pertaining to the other party (CRA in this situation) repeatedly verifying something when the item is pointed out specifically and proof of the error is also provided, and the info provider cannot be contacted by me. | |
| | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:59 PM. 
|
