| | Notices | Welcome to the Infinite Credit forums.
You are currently viewing our Free Credit Repair Forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free credit repair community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content. Due to bandwidth constraints, PDF files can only be downloaded by registered Members.
Our creditforum will help you fix your own personal credit, there is nothing that a credit repair company can do for you, that you cannot do yourself. Registration to our creditforums is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today Please note that we are not attorneys, we are not selling anything, nothing on this site may be construed as legal advice.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. | Advanced Credit Repair - Dealing with Collection Agencies Discuss Is it Common For in the CREDIT AND LEGAL ISSUES forums; ...a company to deny that they report to the CRAs in their answer (when clearly they do)?
I'm wondering what they'd offer as a hypothesis for how a tradeline of ...
04-04-2007, 03:39 AM
|
#1 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 472
Casino Cash: $301150
| Is it Common For ...a company to deny that they report to the CRAs in their answer (when clearly they do)?
I'm wondering what they'd offer as a hypothesis for how a tradeline of theirs wound up on my report.
Mitosis? |
| |
04-04-2007, 07:13 AM
|
#2 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
| Some CA's have been know to report in the OC's name.
If they denied it in an answer, subpoena the CRA records.
__________________ It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation. |
| |
04-04-2007, 10:21 AM
|
#3 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 437
Casino Cash: $353450
| Yes...think of a well-known rats-nest of related JDB's and CA's, and you have their official denial of liability. "It wasn't us, Your Honor, it was THEM (pointing at "CA")!"
Judge didn't see it the same way though...yay!
__________________ Quoted from roybean at IC, "you don't need case law...it is written, so let it be done." |
| |
04-04-2007, 02:24 PM
|
#4 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 472
Casino Cash: $301150
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma Some CA's have been know to report in the OC's name.
If they denied it in an answer, subpoena the CRA records. | No CA involved.
Is there a sample subpoena somewhere?
BTW, they denied extending credit as well.
Last edited by direred; 04-04-2007 at 02:26 PM..
|
| |
04-04-2007, 03:06 PM
|
#5 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 437
Casino Cash: $353450
| Ah! Then, if it's strictly an OC reporting incorrectly, then you have to be careful of the shell game that they play with their operating entities also, such as Capital One Bank vs. Capital One Financial Savings, etc. They do the same finger-pointing. I got the proof of reporting in my case from the CRA, just like Enigma said....there's little they can argue with when their subscriber number is in black and white.
The Myfaircredit.com site has posted a lot of documents that the attornies have filed for their own cases...this one is a RFP for EQ that can be customized for your venue/situation if the CRA is a party to the suit... http://www.myfaircredit.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=492
Or you can use the above form as a starting point for things to ask for and use the following subpeona guidelines to create a subpeona if the CRA isn't a party to the suit... http://www.myfaircredit.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5066
__________________ Quoted from roybean at IC, "you don't need case law...it is written, so let it be done." |
| |
04-04-2007, 03:24 PM
|
#6 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 472
Casino Cash: $301150
| Perfect, that's exactly what I needed. In this case, they don't seem to be playing shell games. Technically, they purchased this account in default, so they're not typically a JDB, they were in this case.
I remember writing an RFP when I was a defendant ages and ages ago (20+ years). I don't remember: is it supposed to be filed with the court? |
| |
04-04-2007, 05:08 PM
|
#7 | | If You Do Not Like It, Kiss My...
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,538
Casino Cash: $1110600
| I'm confused. Who are you suing? OC or a CA/JDB?
__________________ How come "phonetically" is spelt with a "ph"? |
| |
04-04-2007, 05:41 PM
|
#8 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 472
Casino Cash: $301150
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jlynn I'm confused. Who are you suing? OC or a CA/JDB? | I'm suing a JDB who is more frequently an OC (and is an FDIC member, so I have no idea why they generally and specifically denied extending consumer credit, except to be a poo-poo head). |
| |
04-04-2007, 07:12 PM
|
#9 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006 Location: Okinawa
Posts: 6,995
Casino Cash: $2738900
| Quote:
Originally Posted by direred I'm suing a JDB who is more frequently an OC (and is an FDIC member, so I have no idea why they generally and specifically denied extending consumer credit, except to be a poo-poo head). | You're in Federal, right?
__________________ ____________
"Be surprised at what people won't do and not at what they do." |
| |
04-04-2007, 08:12 PM
|
#10 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 472
Casino Cash: $301150
| Yep, sure am. I just don't want to say who it is in public, in part because they are seldom sued. |
| |
04-10-2007, 02:15 PM
|
#11 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 472
Casino Cash: $301150
| Okay.... So I've looked at the requests for production that are about, and the subpoenas.
Since I'm up against an MSJ, it seems that the subpoena is possibly the better answer -- it gives the court a heads up, for one thing.
Would, however, the third parties involved (CRAs in this case) feel more edgy if they received one? Or no?
What's provided may need to be evidence in the court, but may not.
It appears that the defendant may have committed perjury.
(I'm trying to find a lawyer to save my skin, so far no luck.) |
| |
04-10-2007, 02:22 PM
|
#12 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 472
Casino Cash: $301150
| Okay.... So I've looked at the requests for production that are about, and the subpoenas.
Since I'm up against an MSJ, it seems that the subpoena is possibly the better answer -- it gives the court a heads up, for one thing.
Would, however, the third parties involved (CRAs in this case) feel more edgy if they received one? Or no?
What's provided may need to be evidence in the court, but may not.
It appears that the defendant may have committed perjury.
(I'm trying to find a lawyer to save my skin, so far no luck.) |
| |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:07 PM.
|