right
Home Blogs Forums

Privacy Policy Bad credit repair forum

Members Area

Advertisements
APEX CREDIT SERVICES


Casino Navigation
Home Video Poker Blackjack Sports Betting Pool Lottery Slots Texas Hold 'em Let 'em Ride Roulette

Notices

Advanced Credit Repair - Dealing with Collection Agencies Discuss telephonic request for trial. in the CREDIT AND LEGAL ISSUES forums; The evidence is: card agreement dated 2003-she said it defaulted in Jan 2002. She has old CR's that support that. copies of credit card statements when it was charged off ...
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-31-2007, 06:01 PM   #26
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
The evidence is:

card agreement dated 2003-she said it defaulted in Jan 2002. She has old CR's that support that.

copies of credit card statements when it was charged off

copy of a check with a differenct account number on it

affidavit from someone in NY claiming to be the accounts manager for C-1
(are they located in NY)

Anything to add to this. She needed to mts prior to msj. She has kinda done this backwards.
rubyruby27 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 07:47 PM   #27
Administrator
 
Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
What's the date the lawsuit was filed with the clerk.
__________________
It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain

The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation.
Enigma is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 07:53 PM   #28
Administrator
 
Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
1. MTD SOL

2. File for Discovery

3. Motion in Limine to Strike Affidavit as Hersay

4. Motion in Limiine to Preclude Plaintiff's Witness
__________________
It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain

The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation.
Enigma is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 07:57 PM   #29
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
Engima, when I did my msj I did it because from what I read a mtd is filed prior to any other court documents, she filed answers back in 06 they filed MSJ and lost (I don't believe she filed an opposition but showed up).

Will get the info. and post
rubyruby27 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 08:00 PM   #30
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
She did the discovery today.
rubyruby27 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 08:03 PM   #31
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
She was served 9-13-06
rubyruby27 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 09:58 PM   #32
Administrator
 
Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 View Post
She was served 9-13-06
Forget #1, #2 is done, wait until she gets the green card back then Motion for Continuance.

Look at the card agreemnt they sent, is it written any where that governing law is VA? If so do a MTD for SOL based on VA law. CC's in VA have a three year SOL, there is a nice little VA Supreme Court ruling that says so.
__________________
It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain

The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation.
Enigma is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 09:59 PM   #33
Administrator
 
Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 View Post
Engima, when I did my msj I did it because from what I read a mtd is filed prior to any other court documents, she filed answers back in 06 they filed MSJ and lost (I don't believe she filed an opposition but showed up).

Will get the info. and post

Did she include Affirmative Defense(s).
__________________
It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain

The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation.
Enigma is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2007, 02:07 AM   #34
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
check email. yes, but just sol kinda of
rubyruby27 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 05:24 PM   #35
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
Ok this person goes to trial Friday, she called the JA and the attorneys will be present but they are allowing a person to appear by phone.

Does she not have a right to know the name of this person? What questions would she ask this person?

Assuming this person is the one that signed the affidavit----Also, they refused to do rogs in reference to this person. They objected as to burdensome. She filed a motion to compel but it won't be heard until that day.

She has SoL for 4 yrs by 10 days. They are claiming written. It's an iffy situation as they did provide most of the credit card statements and her signuature, terms and agreement that is unreadable.

What questions would you ask?
rubyruby27 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 05:30 PM   #36
Administrator
 
roybean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 6,995
Casino Cash: $2738900
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 View Post
Ok this person goes to trial Friday, she called the JA and the attorneys will be present but they are allowing a person to appear by phone.

Does she not have a right to know the name of this person? What questions would she ask this person?

Assuming this person is the one that signed the affidavit----Also, they refused to do rogs in reference to this person. They objected as to burdensome. She filed a motion to compel but it won't be heard until that day.

She has SoL for 4 yrs by 10 days. They are claiming written. It's an iffy situation as they did provide most of the credit card statements and her signuature, terms and agreement that is unreadable.

What questions would you ask?
3rd party questions are so hard Ruby....why don't you invite him/her to come over and sat a spell with us so we can chew on this first hand?
__________________
____________
"Be surprised at what people won't do and not at what they do."
roybean is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 05:31 PM   #37
HONORED GUEST
 
hannah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West-By-God-Virginia
Posts: 6,518
Casino Cash: $1746925
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 View Post
Ok this person goes to trial Friday, she called the JA and the attorneys will be present but they are allowing a person to appear by phone.

Does she not have a right to know the name of this person? What questions would she ask this person?

Assuming this person is the one that signed the affidavit----Also, they refused to do rogs in reference to this person. They objected as to burdensome. She filed a motion to compel but it won't be heard until that day.

She has SoL for 4 yrs by 10 days. They are claiming written. It's an iffy situation as they did provide most of the credit card statements and her signuature, terms and agreement that is unreadable.

What questions would you ask?
Ruby, if it's Cap1's agreement, the choice of law is VA and a cc in VA SOL is 3 years. Re-read the Brodsky stuff. This is what she needs to argue.
__________________
Please be advised that I am not an attorney and nothing I post on this forum should be construed as legal advice.


Let's Go Mountaineers!!

Let's Go Drink Some Beers!!





hannah is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 06:27 PM   #38
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
I told her that but she never brought it up at any hearings--she did bring it up that the card agreement is not readable. I told her to get them to produce a legible one and to argue that she was unaware of this info due to the fact they never produced a readable copy and then argue borrowing statue VA law.
rubyruby27 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 07:56 PM   #39
Administrator
 
Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
When does the motion calendar close?
__________________
It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain

The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation.
Enigma is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 08:21 PM   #40
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
I don't know I will see if she will come and post here.
rubyruby27 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 11:24 PM   #41
Administrator
 
Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 View Post
Ok this person goes to trial Friday, she called the JA and the attorneys will be present but they are allowing a person to appear by phone.

Does she not have a right to know the name of this person? What questions would she ask this person?

Assuming this person is the one that signed the affidavit----Also, they refused to do rogs in reference to this person. They objected as to burdensome. She filed a motion to compel but it won't be heard until that day.

She has SoL for 4 yrs by 10 days. They are claiming written. It's an iffy situation as they did provide most of the credit card statements and her signuature, terms and agreement that is unreadable.

What questions would you ask?
Did she file the Motion to Strike?

Motion to Compel w/ Sanctions?

State your complete name.

State the name, address and phone number of your employer.

What is your job title?

How long have you worked for xxxx.

How long have you worked in your present position?

Are you a high school graduate?

Do you have a college degree? If so, what was your major?

Have ever lied to anyone or about anything in your life?

Depending answer, how can we be sure you are being truthful today?

Have you ever been reprimanded by your current employer?

What did you do before your came to work for xxxx?

You want to attach the persons character.

The list goes on and on.....
__________________
It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain

The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation.
Enigma is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 11:27 PM   #42
Administrator
 
Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
It might be prudent to arrive a little early, offer plaintiff a settlement, $xxxx cash and payments for them to with hold adjudication on a judgment.

ETA - sine there is time, plaintiff's and her fax machine should be busy trying to settle this based on what I read here she will mostly likely loose.
__________________
It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain

The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation.
Enigma is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 12:04 AM   #43
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
I told her that she will likely lose but she says she is judgement proof and would prefer to fit. She had a chance if she had used the VA statutes.

She told me did motion to compel and motion to strike.

I haven't heard from her tonight--will pass on this info.
rubyruby27 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 12:09 AM   #44
Administrator
 
Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 View Post
I told her that she will likely lose but she says she is judgement proof and would prefer to fit. She had a chance if she had used the VA statutes.

She told me did motion to compel and motion to strike.

I haven't heard from her tonight--will pass on this info.
Did she call the JA to set the Motion on the calendar? If not, that is not good. They will not be heard.

she may be judgment proof now, in FL judgments are renewable and 20 years is a long time.
__________________
It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain

The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation.
Enigma is offline