| | Notices | Welcome to the Infinite Credit forums.
You are currently viewing our Free Credit Repair Forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free credit repair community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content. Due to bandwidth constraints, PDF files can only be downloaded by registered Members.
Our creditforum will help you fix your own personal credit, there is nothing that a credit repair company can do for you, that you cannot do yourself. Registration to our creditforums is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today Please note that we are not attorneys, we are not selling anything, nothing on this site may be construed as legal advice.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. | Advanced Credit Repair - Dealing with Collection Agencies Discuss telephonic request for trial. in the CREDIT AND LEGAL ISSUES forums; The evidence is:
card agreement dated 2003-she said it defaulted in Jan 2002. She has old CR's that support that.
copies of credit card statements when it was charged off
...
07-31-2007, 06:01 PM
|
#26 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
| The evidence is:
card agreement dated 2003-she said it defaulted in Jan 2002. She has old CR's that support that.
copies of credit card statements when it was charged off
copy of a check with a differenct account number on it
affidavit from someone in NY claiming to be the accounts manager for C-1
(are they located in NY)
Anything to add to this. She needed to mts prior to msj. She has kinda done this backwards. |
| |
07-31-2007, 07:47 PM
|
#27 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
| What's the date the lawsuit was filed with the clerk.
__________________ It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation. |
| |
07-31-2007, 07:53 PM
|
#28 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
| 1. MTD SOL
2. File for Discovery
3. Motion in Limine to Strike Affidavit as Hersay
4. Motion in Limiine to Preclude Plaintiff's Witness
__________________ It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation. |
| |
07-31-2007, 07:57 PM
|
#29 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
| Engima, when I did my msj I did it because from what I read a mtd is filed prior to any other court documents, she filed answers back in 06 they filed MSJ and lost (I don't believe she filed an opposition but showed up).
Will get the info. and post |
| |
07-31-2007, 08:00 PM
|
#30 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
| She did the discovery today. |
| |
07-31-2007, 08:03 PM
|
#31 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
| She was served 9-13-06 |
| |
07-31-2007, 09:58 PM
|
#32 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 She was served 9-13-06 | Forget #1, #2 is done, wait until she gets the green card back then Motion for Continuance.
Look at the card agreemnt they sent, is it written any where that governing law is VA? If so do a MTD for SOL based on VA law. CC's in VA have a three year SOL, there is a nice little VA Supreme Court ruling that says so.
__________________ It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation. |
| |
07-31-2007, 09:59 PM
|
#33 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 Engima, when I did my msj I did it because from what I read a mtd is filed prior to any other court documents, she filed answers back in 06 they filed MSJ and lost (I don't believe she filed an opposition but showed up).
Will get the info. and post |
Did she include Affirmative Defense(s).
__________________ It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation. |
| |
08-01-2007, 02:07 AM
|
#34 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
| check email. yes, but just sol kinda of |
| |
09-05-2007, 05:24 PM
|
#35 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
| Ok this person goes to trial Friday, she called the JA and the attorneys will be present but they are allowing a person to appear by phone.
Does she not have a right to know the name of this person? What questions would she ask this person?
Assuming this person is the one that signed the affidavit----Also, they refused to do rogs in reference to this person. They objected as to burdensome. She filed a motion to compel but it won't be heard until that day.
She has SoL for 4 yrs by 10 days. They are claiming written. It's an iffy situation as they did provide most of the credit card statements and her signuature, terms and agreement that is unreadable.
What questions would you ask? |
| |
09-05-2007, 05:30 PM
|
#36 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006 Location: Okinawa
Posts: 6,995
Casino Cash: $2738900
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 Ok this person goes to trial Friday, she called the JA and the attorneys will be present but they are allowing a person to appear by phone.
Does she not have a right to know the name of this person? What questions would she ask this person?
Assuming this person is the one that signed the affidavit----Also, they refused to do rogs in reference to this person. They objected as to burdensome. She filed a motion to compel but it won't be heard until that day.
She has SoL for 4 yrs by 10 days. They are claiming written. It's an iffy situation as they did provide most of the credit card statements and her signuature, terms and agreement that is unreadable.
What questions would you ask? | 3rd party questions are so hard Ruby....why don't you invite him/her to come over and sat a spell with us so we can chew on this first hand?
__________________ ____________
"Be surprised at what people won't do and not at what they do." |
| |
09-05-2007, 05:31 PM
|
#37 | | HONORED GUEST
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: West-By-God-Virginia
Posts: 6,518
Casino Cash: $1746925
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 Ok this person goes to trial Friday, she called the JA and the attorneys will be present but they are allowing a person to appear by phone.
Does she not have a right to know the name of this person? What questions would she ask this person?
Assuming this person is the one that signed the affidavit----Also, they refused to do rogs in reference to this person. They objected as to burdensome. She filed a motion to compel but it won't be heard until that day.
She has SoL for 4 yrs by 10 days. They are claiming written. It's an iffy situation as they did provide most of the credit card statements and her signuature, terms and agreement that is unreadable.
What questions would you ask? | Ruby, if it's Cap1's agreement, the choice of law is VA and a cc in VA SOL is 3 years. Re-read the Brodsky stuff. This is what she needs to argue.
__________________ Please be advised that I am not an attorney and nothing I post on this forum should be construed as legal advice. Let's Go Mountaineers!! Let's Go Drink Some Beers!! |
| |
09-05-2007, 06:27 PM
|
#38 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
| I told her that but she never brought it up at any hearings--she did bring it up that the card agreement is not readable. I told her to get them to produce a legible one and to argue that she was unaware of this info due to the fact they never produced a readable copy and then argue borrowing statue VA law. |
| |
09-05-2007, 07:56 PM
|
#39 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
| When does the motion calendar close?
__________________ It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation. |
| |
09-05-2007, 08:21 PM
|
#40 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
| I don't know I will see if she will come and post here. |
| |
09-05-2007, 11:24 PM
|
#41 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 Ok this person goes to trial Friday, she called the JA and the attorneys will be present but they are allowing a person to appear by phone.
Does she not have a right to know the name of this person? What questions would she ask this person?
Assuming this person is the one that signed the affidavit----Also, they refused to do rogs in reference to this person. They objected as to burdensome. She filed a motion to compel but it won't be heard until that day.
She has SoL for 4 yrs by 10 days. They are claiming written. It's an iffy situation as they did provide most of the credit card statements and her signuature, terms and agreement that is unreadable.
What questions would you ask? | Did she file the Motion to Strike?
Motion to Compel w/ Sanctions?
State your complete name.
State the name, address and phone number of your employer.
What is your job title?
How long have you worked for xxxx.
How long have you worked in your present position?
Are you a high school graduate?
Do you have a college degree? If so, what was your major?
Have ever lied to anyone or about anything in your life?
Depending answer, how can we be sure you are being truthful today?
Have you ever been reprimanded by your current employer?
What did you do before your came to work for xxxx?
You want to attach the persons character.
The list goes on and on.....
__________________ It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation. |
| |
09-05-2007, 11:27 PM
|
#42 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
| It might be prudent to arrive a little early, offer plaintiff a settlement, $xxxx cash and payments for them to with hold adjudication on a judgment.
ETA - sine there is time, plaintiff's and her fax machine should be busy trying to settle this based on what I read here she will mostly likely loose.
__________________ It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation. |
| |
09-06-2007, 12:04 AM
|
#43 | | Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 770
Casino Cash: $350275
| I told her that she will likely lose but she says she is judgement proof and would prefer to fit. She had a chance if she had used the VA statutes.
She told me did motion to compel and motion to strike.
I haven't heard from her tonight--will pass on this info. |
| |
09-06-2007, 12:09 AM
|
#44 | | Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,294
Casino Cash: $963050
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rubyruby27 I told her that she will likely lose but she says she is judgement proof and would prefer to fit. She had a chance if she had used the VA statutes.
She told me did motion to compel and motion to strike.
I haven't heard from her tonight--will pass on this info. | Did she call the JA to set the Motion on the calendar? If not, that is not good. They will not be heard.
she may be judgment proof now, in FL judgments are renewable and 20 years is a long time.
__________________ It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation. |
| |