[sparrow]

background: sued by cap1 via atty; personal info was stolen in '02, answered suit w/that defense, and dv'd them; i just received their reply. the atty who claims to rep OC states their client did not supply them any sales slips or stmt of acct. attached to ltr was a signed acceptance certificate, a bar coded ltr that's suppose to be the disclosure (no terms and cond. though) and 2 stmts: 1) dtd 01/04-02/05 with a note at top stating "60 days past due, your acct is temporarily suspended"; this one shows OC's address and my info on bottom of stmt; 2) dtd 02/03-03/05 w/a note stating "ur acct is about to charge off as a bad debt"; this one does not show OC's address but instead it shows Dbqj ubm Pof and NBJM JE where the cust info would be. What the hay!!? I do not have anything that shows this is my acct (reason i dv'd) any thoughts for said "validation"? thanks!

[Enigma]

Did you file a police report for identity theft.

[apexcrsrvc]

If it wasn't your account, you should have filed a MTD or motion for a more definite statement.

[sparrow]

yes, i filed a pd for the lost id

[sparrow]

Originally Posted by apexcrsrvc

If it wasn't your account, you should have filed a MTD or motion for a more definite statement.

i've asked for disc, should that be enough or in addition to that file the mtd?

i'm just surprised by their reply; i had read in some threads that it wouldn't do any good to dv the OC, i decided to do it anyway (i guess i was testing this theory and wanted to know if i'd get anything) and when i rec'd the ltr from the atty stating their cl doesn't have slips or stmt other than what was sent, i'm thinking "What?!"