|
| Notices |
Welcome to the Infinite Credit forums.
You are currently viewing our Free Credit Repair Forums as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free credit repair community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content. Due to bandwidth constraints, PDF files can only be downloaded by registered Members.
Fix your own personal credit, the same way a credit repair company would. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today Please note that we are not attorneys, we are not selling anything, nothing on this site may be construed as legal advice.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| Advanced Credit Repair - Dealing with Collection Agencies Collection Agencies Dunning you? Are they complying with the FDCPA and or the FCRA? IF they are not, they could be liable for up to $1000.00 to you! This is the forum to educate and protect the rights afforded to you under the FDCPA and the FCRA. Legal aspects of credit restoration will be found in this forum. MEMBERS CAN POST ANONYMOUS QUESTIONS... |
05-18-2008, 08:33 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Way down yonder in the pawpaw patch
Posts: 508
Casino Cash: $399950
|
verification/validation
To verify a debt means what?
To validate a debt means what?
I need a clear understanding of what each means.
Thanks/Lucy
__________________
Learn to have an attitude with gratitude
|
|
|
05-18-2008, 11:51 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,282
Casino Cash: $953450
|
Not to give you a non-answer, but you need to look to case law in your state and federal jurisdiction.
__________________
It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt. - Mark Twain
The information and materials in this document are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, accounting or tax advice or opinions on any specific matters. Laws and regulations change frequently and their application can vary widely based upon the specific facts and circumstances involved. You are responsible for the applicability and accuracy of Information as it relates to your specific situation.
|
|
|
05-19-2008, 03:13 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
HONORED GUEST
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 271
Casino Cash: $522800
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucy
To verify a debt means what?
To validate a debt means what?
I need a clear understanding of what each means.
Thanks/Lucy
|
I think for your purposes, verification means the verification of an account tradeline that is one your credit report. This generally applies to credit reporting agencies and furnishers of information. It also could apply to a communication that you send to an orginal creditor. We're talking FCRA (and, FACTA amendments thereto) here.
Conversely, validation would apply to debt collectors under the FDCPA and original creditor in a few jurisdictions state consumer protection Acts. This would arise by virtue of you contacting them. Thereafter, they supply you a very marginal amount of information from the original creditor.
__________________
http://www.apexcreditservices.com
No part of the post above or anything posted by us herein is to be considered legal advice. If you seek legal advice, contact a licensed attorney within your jurisdiction. No part of our website link, including clicking upon it, constitutes an offer of any kind or an advertisement to seek an agreement of any kind. Its placement here is for informational purposes exclusively.
|
|
|
05-19-2008, 10:20 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Way down yonder in the pawpaw patch
Posts: 508
Casino Cash: $399950
|
I've been reading and I think that is where I am getting confused, there is not a clear definition on what validation is. I understand verification, I think. A relative of mine is wanting to know and I don't get it enough to answer correctly.
Scenario: Sent dispute letter to ca within 30 days of initial notice. Got a letter from ca saying, "in response to your request for verification enclosed is notice of verification." It lists name, address, oc and date the acct was purchased. All they did here was verify the debt, is that right?
Do you have to come right out and say, I dispute the validity of the debt? Was it not enough to say, the amount, character and legal status of the alleged debt is disputed? Is sending another letter in order to obtain the original date of the debt?
Now do you see why I am confused 
__________________
Learn to have an attitude with gratitude
|
|
|
05-19-2008, 01:31 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
HONORED GUEST
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 271
Casino Cash: $522800
|
Under your scenario, this is proper validation if it was forwarded from the original creditor.
It is best to simply state: "I dispute the validity of this debt."
__________________
http://www.apexcreditservices.com
No part of the post above or anything posted by us herein is to be considered legal advice. If you seek legal advice, contact a licensed attorney within your jurisdiction. No part of our website link, including clicking upon it, constitutes an offer of any kind or an advertisement to seek an agreement of any kind. Its placement here is for informational purposes exclusively.
|
|
|
05-19-2008, 03:25 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
If You Do Not Like It, Kiss My...
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,524
Casino Cash: $1099100
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucy
I've been reading and I think that is where I am getting confused, there is not a clear definition on what validation is. I understand verification,
|
The only real answer as to the clear definition of validation is whatever satisfies a court. 
__________________
How come "phonetically" is spelt with a "ph"?
|
|
|
05-19-2008, 04:00 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Way down yonder in the pawpaw patch
Posts: 508
Casino Cash: $399950
|
This last letter came from an attorney for a ca. As I was looking through the original letter and the last one I noticed that the name of the current creditor had changed...in one month's time. I did a google search and saw that this place is one in the same, that they are known to change names often because of judgments against them. It appears that they are definitely bottom feeders. I also checked out the attorney and he seems to be known as one also. Anyone that cares to, do a google search on first american investment company and see what I am talking about.
This was disputed on cr's, waiting to hear their verdict. In the meantime, should I tell my relative to just wait and see what the cra's do or send this place another letter telling them to validate?
The disputes were made on 4-21 and as of today still showing under investigation.
__________________
Learn to have an attitude with gratitude
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 AM.
|