Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
MAY NOT BE CITED TO OR BY THE COURTS OF THIS CIRCUIT  
Old 08-24-2006, 11:18 PM   #1
Administrator
roybean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 7,217
I just found a slew of cases that all say MAY NOT BE CITED TO OR BY THE COURTS OF THIS CIRCUIT.
Anyone ever seen this before? Because some of these cases would be good case law.
__________________
____________
"Be surprised at what people won't do and not at what they do."
roybean is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-24-2006, 11:30 PM   #2
Administrator
roybean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 7,217
I found this:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2001/05/sorchini.html
__________________
____________
"Be surprised at what people won't do and not at what they do."
roybean is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-24-2006, 11:45 PM   #3
HONORED GUEST
centex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austin-area
Posts: 3,135
It is a practice that seems to be more common in some Circuits than in others. My guess is that it is a fancy way of saying...since we didn't publish it, we aren't going to allow it as precedent since it disadvantages the litigant without online access to retrieve the opinion from the Court's website. I've never asked any of them why they were doing that though...might be good discussion next time I have lunch with Judge Sparks.
centex is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arbitration roybean Case Law 4 10-17-2006 02:41 PM
Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp roybean Case Law 0 09-30-2006 12:35 AM
PAVELIC & LeFLORE v. MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT roybean Case Law 1 09-28-2006 02:47 AM
PICKHOLTZ v. RAINBOW TECHNOLOGIES roybean Case Law 0 08-09-2006 01:07 PM
Martinez v. Albuquerque Collection Services roybean Case Law 1 06-11-2006 01:45 PM

InfiniteCredit News

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Credit Repair Forum | Site content remains the intellectual property of InfiniteCredit.com and may not be duplicated or reproduced without prior consent.Ad Management plugin by RedTyger


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57